US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 20,674
ROSARIO v. LOVERA et al
as 5:2024cv01924
Plaintiff:
JOVAN ROSARIO
Defendant:
JERAMY LOVERA, OFFICER BEST, SARGENT NAME UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOLDNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01868
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GOLDNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SAUERWINE v. HOLIHAN et al
as 5:2024cv01904
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SAUERWINE
Defendant:
GAVIN P. HOLIHAN and RICHARD COBLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KONATA v. RAMOS et al
as 2:2024cv01902
Plaintiff:
MATTHEWS KONATA
Defendant:
RAMOS, ABDUR-RAZZAQ, HOSKINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALWARD v. ELKTON FSL et al
as 2:2024cv01888
Petitioner:
MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD
Respondent:
ELKTON FSL and BRIAN NEWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ALWARD v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv01894
Petitioner:
MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD and MATTHEW KEITH BERRY
Respondent:
MDOC, WASHTENAW COUNTY and WAYNE COUNTY COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALWARD v. FCI OXFORD et al
as 2:2024cv01883
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD and MATTHEW KEITH BERRY
Defendant:
FCI OXFORD, LT. BROESCH and WARDEN EMMERICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERRING v. KAUFFMAN
as 2:2024cv01867
Plaintiff:
TARAY HERRING
Defendant:
EARL G. KAUFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: QUINZEL CAIBY
as 2:2024cv01844
Plaintiff:
QUINZEL CAIBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOSKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01845
Plaintiff:
TITO HOSKINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
