US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 7,256
Calvin v. 201 Poplar Shelby County Jail
as 2:2024cv02098
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Marquez Calvin
Defendant:
201 Poplar Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Itson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02092
Plaintiff:
Kardell A. Itson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Steve Mulroy, Michael Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullins v. Tate et al
as 1:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Shawn Anthony Mullins
Defendant:
Danny Tate, Margie Hays, Tiffany Garr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Strata et al
as 1:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sanders
Defendant:
Frank Strata, Brandon Watwood and John Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02089
Petitioner:
Bernard Frazier
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sayyed v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02083
Petitioner:
Aziz Ihab Sayyed and Azia Ihab Sayyed
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bannister v. Naveed
as 2:2024cv02084
Plaintiff:
Waylon Bannister
Defendant:
Gill Naveed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dalton v. Fisk et al
as 2:2024cv02080
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Dalton
Defendant:
John Fisk and Centurion Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Agins v. Madison County Jail
as 1:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Ahmeada Agins
Defendant:
Madison County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
