US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 7,256
Perkins v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv01023
Petitioner:
Andre Perkins
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02037
Petitioner:
Derrick Taylor
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Benson v. Fields et al
as 2:2024cv02041
Plaintiff:
Rickey Benson
Defendant:
Kirk Fields, Deputy Wright, Supervisors of Deputy Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toomes v. Working et al
as 1:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Antonio Toomes
Defendant:
Michael Ryan Working and Clayburn Peeples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baine v. Weaver et al
as 1:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Jason Baine
Defendant:
Clyde Weaver, Steven Whitlock and Decatur County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Taylor et al
as 2:2024cv02024
Plaintiff:
Henry Morris
Defendant:
Daniel J. Taylor and Spragins, Barnett, Cobb & Butler, Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pankey v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01011
Petitioner:
Jaycent Pankey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Demos v. Trump
as 2:2024cv02022
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurdle v. Jenkins
as 2:2024cv02013
Petitioner:
Devontez Hurdle
Respondent:
Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hamblin v. Alexander et al
as 2:2024cv02015
Plaintiff:
Robert Hamblin
Defendant:
Anthony Alexander, Mr. Doctor Morton, Erica N. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
