US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 68,641
Loe v. State Farm Lloyds
as 6:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
John Loe
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Best Way Express, Inc. v. 101 Transport LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Best Way Express, Inc.
Defendant:
101 Transport LLC, Mohamed Ali Issa and Mohomed Farrah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Letney v. County of San Augustine et al
as 9:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Tasha Letney
Defendant:
County of San Augustine, Robert Cartwright and Terry Fountain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Jerry Dean Smith, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frankenfield v. Goodall et al
as 9:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
FNU Smith, FNU Goodall, TDCJ Parole Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frankenfield v. Smith et al
as 9:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
FNU Smith and Unknown Others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphries v. Garland et al
as 6:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
David G. Humphries
Defendant:
Merrick Garland and Steven Dettelbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00239
Petitioner:
Joseph Gabriel Thompson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Shilling v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Ryan Joel Shilling
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ellis v. USA
as 6:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Ellis
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.