US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Cases 11 - 20 of 69,181
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Williams v. Dart Transit Company [US DOT#75525] et al
as 2:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Gerrick Darell Williams
Defendant:
Dart Transit Company [US DOT#75525], Fleetline doing business as Dart Transit Company, Quantrez Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SCR Networks LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc.
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
SCR Networks LLC
Defendant:
Cisco Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
HUSKY INJECTION MOLDING SYSTEMS LTD. v. NINGBO AO SHENG MOLD CO., LTD. d/b/a AOSIMI
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
HUSKY INJECTION MOLDING SYSTEMS LTD.
Defendant:
NINGBO AO SHENG MOLD CO., LTD. d/b/a AOSIMI
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Infogation Corporation v. Porsche AG
as 2:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Infogation Corporation
Defendant:
Porsche AG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Terry et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
James Terry and Tryla Terry
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Hayes v. Carmart, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Hayes, Jr
Defendant:
Carmart, Inc. doing business as Carmart of Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lester v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00413
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
