US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Cases 41 - 50 of 69,156
Farr, Sr. v. Ponthler et al
as 9:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Willie Ned Farr, Sr.
Defendant:
Courtney Tracy Ponthler, Robert J. Burby, Jessie C. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Cullipher
as 6:2024cv00169
Defendant:
Lori Cullipher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Turner et al v. Marx et al
as 2:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Sally Turner and Joseph Bock
Defendant:
Dale Marx, Southern Pride Trucking, Inc., Southern Pride Trucking, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Olvera-Galvan v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Olvera-Galvan
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Chambers v. SHU Staff at USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dontriel Chambers
Defendant:
SHU Staff at USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hidleburg et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
George Alford Hidleburg and Gertrude Lynne Martin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Lummus v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas
as 6:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Donny Lummus
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Retaliation Wrongful Termination
Hall v. Welch, Jr.
as 9:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hall
Defendant:
Thomas H. Welch, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Commissioner, SSA
as 4:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Latisha Sanders
Defendant:
Commissioner, SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Slyde Analytics LLC v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Slyde Analytics LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
