US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Labor Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 180
Harrison v. Family Medicine Associates of Texas, P.A. et al
as 4:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Robert E Harrison
Defendant:
Family Medicine Associates of Texas, P.A. and Mary Neal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Harris v. Huawei Technologies USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00913
Defendant:
Huawei Technologies USA, Inc. and Pan Yao
Plaintiff:
LaTanya Harris and Mark Bibb
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Wooten v. Shelton Restaurant Group, LLC
as 1:2016cv00480
Plaintiff:
Antonyo Darome Wooten
Defendant:
Shelton Restaurant Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Schuchman v. Hall Financial Group, Ltd.
as 4:2016cv00820
Plaintiff:
Debrah K. Schuchman
Defendant:
Hall Financial Group, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pugh v. Walmart Stores, Inc. Texas Injury Care Benefit Plan et al
as 9:2016cv00162
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Pugh
Defendant:
Walmart Stores, Inc. Texas Injury Care Benefit Plan and Walmart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Fekih-Romdhane v. Acacia Research Group, LLC
as 4:2016cv00711
Plaintiff:
Khaled Fekih-Romdhane
Defendant:
Acacia Research Group, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Acacia Research Group, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Khaled Fekih-Romdhane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
HELM v. Alan Ritchey, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00625
Plaintiff:
SHERRI D HELM
Defendant:
Alan Ritchey, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pratt v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 2:2016cv00247
Plaintiff:
Terry Pratt
Defendant:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Bradley v. Fleetserve, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00033
Plaintiff:
Shawn M Bradley
Defendant:
Fleetserve, LLC, Automotive Fleetserve, LLC and Fleetserve One, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duke v. City of Grand Saline
as 6:2015cv01174
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Duke
Defendant:
City of Grand Saline
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
