US District Court for the District of Utah Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 389
LHF Productions v. Helquist et al.
as 2:2019cv00371
Defendant:
Internet Subscribers 1-8, Rudy Bernal, Morgan Shimer and others
Plaintiff:
LHF Productions
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Design Basics v. KH Design
as 1:2019cv00051
Defendant:
KH Design
Plaintiff:
Design Basics
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Bodyguard Productions v. Griffiths et al.
as 2:2019cv00356
Plaintiff:
Bodyguard Productions
Defendant:
Internet Subscribers 1-8, Mataulufotu Aiono, Lomalinda Tonga and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
LHF Productions v. Meyers
as 2:2019cv00349
Defendant:
Internet Subscribers 1-9 and Stephanie Meyers
Plaintiff:
LHF Productions
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
LHF Productions v. Internet Subscribers 1-12
as 2:2019cv00347
Defendant:
Internet Subscribers 1-12
Plaintiff:
LHF Productions
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Bodyguard Productions v. Avanesyan, et al.
as 2:2019cv00345
Plaintiff:
Bodyguard Productions
Defendant:
Internet Subscribers 1-7, Keri Deros, Kristia Le Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Nelson v. SymbolArts
as 2:2019cv00340
Plaintiff:
Eric Nelson
Defendant:
SymbolArts
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Bodyguard Productions v. Dmitrich, et al.
as 2:2019cv00339
Defendant:
Internet Subscribers 1-9, Diane Burnett, Rex Butters and others
Plaintiff:
Bodyguard Productions
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Bodyguard Productions v. Larsen, et al.
as 2:2019cv00336
Plaintiff:
Bodyguard Productions
Defendant:
Internet Subscribers 1-8, Menlove Properties, Cari Farr and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Bodyguard Productions v. Cowlishaw, et al.
as 2:2019cv00337
Defendant:
Internet Subscribers 1-13, Kurtis Lamb, Evan Meigs and others
Plaintiff:
Bodyguard Productions
Petitioner:
Treasure Wanczyk
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
