US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,381
Ignatius, Pharmacy Manager
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Van Prince
Defendant:
Ignatius, Pharmacy Manager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Oh v. Dexian et al
as 1:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Thomas Oh
Defendant:
Dexian and CACI International Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Wrongful Termination of Employment
Shahid v. South African Airways et al
as 1:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Kesha M. Shahid
Defendant:
South African Airways, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bui v. Lam et al
as 1:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Khai Bui
Defendant:
Van Lam and Thomas F. Gabbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. Robinson et al
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Chamika Richardson
Defendant:
Louis Robinson, Devon Gwyn, Amani Eisa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Scott v. Ross, et al.
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Alicia Scott
Defendant:
Alan Ross and Randall Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Civil Rights
McKinney v. Parker et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Bianca McKinney
Defendant:
Westbrook J. Parker and Robert J. Humphreys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Rubio v. The City of Alexandria Virginia et al
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Yasmani Gurri Rubio
Defendant:
The City of Alexandria Virginia, Justin M. Wilson, ADP Cody Savage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Halvorsen, et al. v. Powhatan County Public Schools, et al.
as 3:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
John Halvorsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Payne v. Moser
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Payne
Defendant:
Joshua Moser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
