US District Court for the Western District of Virginia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,007
Crichlow v. Clarke et al
as 4:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Alexander Crichlow
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, A. David Robinson, Barry Kanode and others
Coleman v. Ayers et al
as 6:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Zachary R. Coleman
Defendant:
Jennifer Ayers and Lynn Muterspaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. City Of Lynchburg et al
as 6:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Regina Davis
Defendant:
City Of Lynchburg, Ryan Zuidema, Police Officer #1 S.H. Gifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coley v. Dauley
as 7:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
Deborah W. Coley
Defendant:
Sharon Dauley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Green v. Lilly et al
as 7:2023cv00151
Defendant:
Ashley Bradberry, Jacob Blaine Lilly, Ashley Umberger and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Dylan Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Lilly et al
as 7:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Edward Davis
Defendant:
Jacob Blaine Lilly, Alisha Romain, Gregory Winston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wesley v. The City of Lynchburg et al
as 6:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Calvin Wesley
Defendant:
The City of Lynchburg, LPD Officer Seth Reed, LPD Officer Austin Rowland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Baird v. Ex Parte
as 2:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Baird
Defendant:
Ex Parte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scarborough v. Wiley et al
as 5:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Christie Scarborough
Defendant:
William "Bill" Wiley and Susan Shick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price v. White et al
as 5:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Price
Defendant:
Phillip White, Kyle Smith, Derinda Dameron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
