US District Court for the Western District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 11,208
Palmer v. Patrick County Sheriffs Office et al
as 7:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Seth D. Palmer
Defendant:
Patrick County Sheriffs Office, Deputy Kenny, Deputy Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yeats v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00263
Petitioner:
Killian Yeats
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Timothy James Thomas
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Compton v. S.W.V.R.J.A.
as 7:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Dean Compton, Jr.
Defendant:
S.W.V.R.J.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Bell
as 7:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Brian Richardson
Defendant:
Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cockhern v. Warden of U.S.P. Lee
as 7:2024cv00260
Petitioner:
Anthony Cockhern
Respondent:
Warden of U.S.P. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Compton v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Medical et al
as 7:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Jeffery D. Compton
Defendant:
Nurse Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Medical and Addiction Counselor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Mullen et al
as 7:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
B. Mullen and WRSP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Halmolton
as 7:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
David Robinson
Defendant:
Chad Halmolton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. Stump et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Stump, J.A. Murray, Alfed Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
