US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 5,930
Leon v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00346
Petitioner:
Nestor Leon
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bandy v. Mon County EMS et al
as 3:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
David Lawrence Bandy
Defendant:
Mon County EMS, WVa Medi Inc, Christopher Goode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abraham v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00347
Petitioner:
Daniel Abraham
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cohen v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cohen
Defendant:
United States of America, Eddie Anderson, Dr. Emery McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa-Sanchez v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00237
Petitioner:
Gilbert Rosa-Sanchez
Respondent:
Heather L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanchez v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00238
Petitioner:
Willy Sanchez
Respondent:
S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wood v. FCI Gilmer
as 5:2023cv00339
Petitioner:
Wesley Wood
Respondent:
Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gama-Perez v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00340
Petitioner:
Josue Gama-Perez
Respondent:
Acting Warden S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hall v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00337
Petitioner:
Marc Pierre Hall
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Terrell v. Lovett
as 3:2023cv00235
Petitioner:
Brooks Terrell
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
