US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 1,765
Fultz v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00281
Petitioner:
Ryan Christopher Fultz
Respondent:
Warden Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Miller v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00241
Petitioner:
Barrington Miller
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Patrick v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00234
Petitioner:
Steven Randall Patrick
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ingram v. Searls
as 2:2023cv00230
Petitioner:
David L. Ingram
Respondent:
Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patrick v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00232
Petitioner:
Steven Randall Patrick
Defendant:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sproles v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00223
Petitioner:
Michael William Sproles
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. United States District Court
as 5:2023cv00224
Petitioner:
Lachaunti Williams
Respondent:
United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lambka v. W.V.D.O.C.
as 2:2023cv00225
Petitioner:
Neil Lambka
Respondent:
W.V.D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lambka v. W.V. Parole
as 2:2023cv00221
Petitioner:
Neil Lambka
Respondent:
W.V. Parole and Superintendent
Consolidated Defendant:
W.V.D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bishop v. Searls
as 1:2023cv00222
Petitioner:
Mason Bishop
Respondent:
State of West Virginia and Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
