Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,359
Primacy, LLC v. Cyr et al
as 3:2024cv00717
Plaintiff:
Primacy, LLC
Defendant:
Matt Cyr and Unlock Health
First National Property Management L.L.C v. May
as 3:2024mc03005
Petitioner:
First National Property Management L.L.C
Respondent:
James May
Mechanix Wear LLC v. Dan Branson et al
as 2:2024cv03078
Plaintiff:
Mechanix Wear LLC
Defendant:
Dan Branson and Performance Fabrics Incorporated dba HexArmor
Mechanix Wear LLC v. Dan Branson et al
as 2:2024cv03090
Plaintiff:
Mechanix Wear LLC
Defendant:
Dan Branson and Performance Fabrics Incorporated dba HexArmor
Amspec, LLC v. Camin Cargo Control, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Amspec, LLC
Defendant:
Camin Cargo Control, Inc., Craig Rodrigue, Nicholas McClendon and others
American Plastics LLC v. Hummel et al.
as 3:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
American Plastics LLC
Defendant:
Eric Hummel, Findlay Machine & Tool Inc., Kreate Extrusion, LLC and others
WINDOW GENIE SPV LLC d/b/a WINDOW GENIE as successor-in-interest for FOR FRANCHISING, LLC v. MD-1, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
WINDOW GENIE SPV LLC d/b/a WINDOW GENIE as successor-in-interest for FOR FRANCHISING, LLC
Defendant:
MD-1, LLC and DRAGAN MALESEVIC
WINDOW GENIE SPV LLC d/b/a WINDOW GENIE as successor-in-interest for FOR FRANCHISING, LLC v. MD-1, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
WINDOW GENIE SPV LLC d/b/a WINDOW GENIE as successor-in-interest for FOR FRANCHISING, LLC
Defendant:
MD-1, LLC and DRAGAN MALESEVIC
Catalyst Campus for Technology and Innovation et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Catalyst Campus for Technology and Innovation and The O'Neil Group Company, LLC
Defendant:
Aniza Brown and Rosie Project
Catalyst Campus for Technology and Innovation et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Catalyst Campus for Technology and Innovation and The O'Neil Group Company, LLC
Defendant:
Aniza Brown, Rosie Project and Jane and John Does 1-50
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
