US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,814
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gess et al v. BAM Trading Services, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Adin Gess, Noach Newman, Maya Parizer and others
Defendant:
BAM Trading Services, Inc. d/b/a Binance.us, Binance Holdings, Lts., d/b/a/ Binance and ChangPeng Zhao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350 Alien's action for tort
United States of America v. Alexander et al
as 3:2024mc04019
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lashelia Alexander
Garnishee:
Aspirion Health Resources LLC
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Daughtry
as 1:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
James Blake Daughtry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GardaWorld Federal Services, LLC et al v. Wells et al
as 2:2024mc04018
Plaintiff:
GardaWorld Federal Services, LLC and Aegis Defense Services, LLC
Defendant:
Jason B. Wells and Jackson Thornton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Harrison v. Emery Insurance Group Inc.
as 2:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Carlton Harrison
Defendant:
Emery Insurance Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
State of Alabama et al v. Durham
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Gregory Durham
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
