US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Singleton et al v. City of Montgomery, Alabama et al
as 2:2020cv00099
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Alabama, Derrick Cunningham and Hal Taylor
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Singleton, Micki Holmes and Ricky Vickery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Motley v. Taylor
as 2:2019cv00478
Plaintiff:
Sharon Motley
Defendant:
Hal Taylor
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Robinson et al v. Marshall
as 2:2019cv00365
Defendant:
Mark H. LeQuire, Ashley Rich, Hays Webb and others
Plaintiff:
Yashica Robinson, Alabama Women's Center and Planned Parenthood Southeast Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Libertarian Party of Alabama v. Merrill
as 2:2019cv00069
Plaintiff:
Libertarian Party of Alabama
Defendant:
John Harold Merrill
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Cook et al v. Taylor
as 2:2018cv00977
Plaintiff:
Lakendra Cook, Sharon Motley and Christopher Gray
Defendant:
Hal Taylor
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Henry v. Marshall et al
as 2:2017cv00638
Plaintiff:
William E. Henry
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall and Miles M. Hart
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Doe 1 et al v. Strange et al(JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2015cv00606
Plaintiff:
John Doe 1 , John Doe 2 , John Doe 3 and others
Defendant:
Luther Strange, III and John Richardson
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Reproductive Health Services, et al. v. Strange, et al. (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2014cv01014
Plaintiff:
Reproductive Health Services and June Ayers
Defendant:
Luther Strange and Daryl D. Bailey
Cause Of Action: Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Williams v. Bennett (MAG+)
as 2:2014cv00890
Defendant:
Jim Bennett
Plaintiff:
Victor Sanchez Williams
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Neelley v. Walker, et al.
as 2:2014cv00269
Plaintiff:
Judith A. Neelley
Defendant:
Clifford Walker, William W. Wynne, Jr. and Robert P. Longshore
Cause Of Action: Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
