US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 3,512
McGatha v. Johnson
as 4:2023cv01454
Petitioner:
Lamar Ray McGatha
Respondent:
Cassandra Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Strawderman v. Norton
as 4:2023cv01456
Petitioner:
Christopher Strawderman
Respondent:
Jonathan W. Norton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pierce v. Norton
as 4:2023cv01455
Plaintiff:
Steven Pierce
Defendant:
Jonathan W Norton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gutierrez-Benitez v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01443
Petitioner:
Hilda Gutierrez-Benitez
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gasser-Castillo v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01444
Petitioner:
Maribel Gasser-Castillo
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vallejo-Hernandez v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01431
Petitioner:
Marilda G Vallejo-Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gutierrez-Ramirez v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01420
Petitioner:
Adriana Gutierrez-Ramirez
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carmichael v. Butler et al
as 1:2023cv01393
Petitioner:
LaForest Carmichael
Respondent:
Reosha Butler and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burnett v. Norton
as 4:2023cv01395
Petitioner:
Charles Burnett
Respondent:
Jonathan Norton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bell v. Aron
as 7:2023cv01384
Petitioner:
Nelson Radbourne Bell
Respondent:
Aron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
