US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 3,514
Gilley v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 5:2023cv01593
Plaintiff:
Dale William Gilley, Jr
Defendant:
Joseph Headley and Steven T Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moss v. McClain et al
as 5:2023cv01600
Petitioner:
Scotty Dale Moss
Respondent:
Antonio McClain and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reagan v. Warden Kimberly Neely
as 7:2023cv01588
Petitioner:
Casondra Reagan
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burgess v. Allen
as 5:2023cv01548
Petitioner:
Charles Patrick Wayne Burgess
Respondent:
Kelly Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VanPelt v. Warden
as 7:2023cv01550
Petitioner:
Hunter VanPelt
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tzoy v. Neely et al
as 7:2023cv01549
Petitioner:
Eluvina Car Tzoy
Respondent:
Warden K Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Keeton v. Crabtree et al
as 5:2023cv01512
Petitioner:
Eric Keeton
Respondent:
Warden Chadwick Crabtree and Hon. Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collingwood v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01489
Petitioner:
Shellee L Collingwood
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly K Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Holladay v. Kimberly
as 1:2023cv01490
Petitioner:
William Lee Holladay, III
Respondent:
M Kimberly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Miller v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01470
Petitioner:
Shannon Miller
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
