US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Broadnax v. Thomas
as 2:2013cv01142
Petitioner:
Donald Broadnax
Respondent:
Kim Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Thomas
as 2:2013cv00557
Petitioner:
Willie B Smith, III
Respondent:
Kim T Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Miller v. Thomas
as 2:2013cv00154
Petitioner:
Alan Eugene Miller
Respondent:
Kim T Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Moody v. Thomas
as 2:2012cv04139
Petitioner:
Walter Leroy Moody
Respondent:
Kim T Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Daniel v. Thomas
as 2:2012cv02526
Petitioner:
Renard Marcel Daniel
Respondent:
Kim T Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Mack v. Rathman et al
as 1:2010cv03341
Petitioner:
Willie Louis Mack
Respondent:
John T. Rathman and Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James v. Culliver et al
as 2:2010cv02929
Petitioner:
Joe Nathan James
Respondent:
Grant Culliver and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Windsor v. Allen et al
as 4:2010cv02223
Petitioner:
Harvey Windsor
Respondent:
Richard Allen and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clemons v. Allen et al
as 2:2010cv02218
Petitioner:
Eugene Milton Clemons, II
Respondent:
Richard F. Allen, Grantt Culliver and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maxwell v. Allen et al
as 3:2010cv02066
Petitioner:
Michael Craig Maxwell
Respondent:
Richard Allen and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.