US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 2,383
Parker v. Crossbridge Behavioral Health
as 2:2023cv01480
Plaintiff:
Stefano Markell Parker
Defendant:
Crossbridge Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zulu v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
Muzuz Mussun Ali Bamu Zulu and Milton Dudley
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Karen Williams, Elizabeth Laseter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Cullman County Jail et al
as 5:2023cv01468
Plaintiff:
Sterling C Davis, III
Defendant:
Cullman County Jail, Black, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Officer Gaither et al
as 4:2023cv01441
Plaintiff:
Kyle Butler
Defendant:
Officer Gaither, Officer Ward, Officer Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. Marion County Jail (INMATE 4)
as 6:2023cv01438
Plaintiff:
John Paul Burnett
Defendant:
Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. State of Alabama et al
as 3:2023cv01429
Plaintiff:
Allen Wayne West
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Kobie Gene Kavich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Kitchens et al
as 4:2023cv01430
Plaintiff:
Stephen Earl Adams
Defendant:
John Kitchens and Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Gordy et al
as 7:2023cv01428
Plaintiff:
Terry Perkins
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy and John Hutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smelley v. Morgan
as 2:2023cv01419
Plaintiff:
Lionel Matizie Smelley
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Weathington et al
as 2:2023cv01404
Plaintiff:
Kyle Butler
Defendant:
Billy R Weathington, Lyle Harmon, Carol Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
