US District Court for the District of Arizona Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 4,209
Harris v. Equifax Incorporated
as 2:2023cv02495
Defendant:
Anferni Juwan Harris and Equifax Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Experian
as 2:2023cv02496
Plaintiff:
Anferni Juwan Harris
Defendant:
Experian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanger et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2023cv02498
Plaintiff:
Joel Hanger and Stephanie Stephens
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Lisa VandenBerg, Joseph Kiefer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Limon v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Perla Limon
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Theodore Mellas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nakanwagi v. Arizona, State of
as 3:2023cv08610
Plaintiff:
Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nakanwagi v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02441
Plaintiff:
Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cestro v. Snowflake Justice Court
as 3:2023cv08608
Plaintiff:
Dominick Cestro
Defendant:
Snowflake Justice Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mahoney v. Valdez et al
as 3:2023cv08607
Plaintiff:
John Francis Mahoney
Defendant:
Sheena Valdez, Danielle Thorhaug, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Mace v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 2:2023cv02426
Plaintiff:
Kelley Justin Mace
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA and Michael P Santosassimo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Greer v. Pima County Attorney's Office
as 4:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Eric Greer
Defendant:
Pima County Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
