US District Court for the District of Arizona Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,021
Blanton #312658 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01823
Petitioner:
Leland Terrance Blanton
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Skinner
as 2:2024cv01800
Petitioner:
Cary C Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Russell Skinner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramsland v. Hudson
as 4:2024cv00360
Petitioner:
Shannon L Ramsland
Respondent:
B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Eldridge v. Gutierrez
as 4:2024cv00366
Petitioner:
Clinton Thoredore Eldridge
Respondent:
Unknown Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2024cv01801
Petitioner:
Craig Vanaldo Smith
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Caughron v. Noltey et al
as 2:2024cv01780
Petitioner:
Lakisha Nicole Caughron
Respondent:
Kris Mayes and Unknown Noltey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Gunther
as 2:2024cv01790
Respondent:
Jason Gunther
Petitioner:
Jacob P Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Gunther
as 2:2024cv01768
Petitioner:
David Jamal Brown
Respondent:
Jason Gunther
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia v. Thornell
as 2:2024cv01747
Petitioner:
Octavio Garcia
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tull #294591 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01756
Petitioner:
Conrad Anthony Tull
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Ryan F Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
