District of Arizona Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 4,877
Thorne v. Shartle
as 4:2017cv00516
Petitioner: Jason S Thorne
Respondent: Unknown Shartle
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ginnis v. Shartle
as 4:2017cv00515
Petitioner: Wayne Ginnis
Respondent: JT Shartle
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Valdez v. Ryan et al
as 4:2017cv00509
Petitioner: German B Valdez
Respondent: Charles L Ryan, Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv03773
Petitioner: Eric Shaw Gibson
Respondent: Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson #181293 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv03763
Petitioner: Eric Shaw Gibson
Respondent: Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniels v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2017cv03650
Petitioner: Daisy Daniels
Respondent: Unknown Party, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2017cv03685
Petitioner: Orren Alven Davis
Respondent: Arizona, State of, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mathis v. Ryan
as 2:2017cv03631
Petitioner: Charles Williams Mathis
Respondent: Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ball v. Ryan et al
as 4:2017cv00497
Petitioner: Earl Ball
Respondent: Charles L Ryan, Gerald Thompson
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mancinas-Flores v. Ryan et al
as 4:2017cv00499
Plaintiff: Jose Ramon Mancinas-Flores
Respondent: Charles Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?