U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,203
Oliphant v. United States of America
as 4:2025cv00117
Petitioner:
Christopher Lynn Oliphant
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nieto v. Gutierrez
as 4:2025cv00112
Petitioner:
Hilario Nieto
Respondent:
Unknown Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lopez-Echeverria v. Gutierrez
as 4:2025cv00113
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Lopez-Echeverria
Respondent:
Unknown Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Perez v. Hudson
as 4:2025cv00108
Petitioner:
Frank Perez, Jr.
Respondent:
B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brooks v. Thornell et al
as 2:2025cv00756
Petitioner:
Michael Eugene Brooks
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conley v. Gunther
as 2:2025cv00717
Petitioner:
Daevon P Conley
Respondent:
Jason Gunther
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Gunther
as 2:2025cv00714
Petitioner:
Christopher R Anderson
Respondent:
Jason Gunther
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Gunther
as 2:2025cv00719
Petitioner:
Christopher R Anderson
Respondent:
Jason Gunther
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jervis v. Gunther
as 2:2025cv00730
Petitioner:
Ronald M Jervis
Respondent:
Jason Gunther
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
White #351380 v. Thornell et al
as 3:2025cv08042
Petitioner:
Timothy White
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
