US District Court for the District of Arizona Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,260
Coleman #337202 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01619
Petitioner: Robert Lee Coleman
Respondent: David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wade v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona et al
as 2:2021cv01599
Petitioner: Nathaniel Wade
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parks v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv08207
Petitioner: Edward Faye Parks
Respondent: Mathew Smith, William Simon, Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brasel v. Nielson et al
as 3:2021cv08198
Petitioner: Myron C Brasel
Respondent: Dale P Nielson, Robert J Higgins, Ralph Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arias #150997 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01570
Petitioner: Genaro Lopez Arias
Respondent: David C Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bucholtz #306378 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01561
Petitioner: Jeffrey Glenn Bucholtz
Respondent: David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ratigan v. Howard
as 4:2021cv00363
Petitioner: Shawn Francis Ratigan
Respondent: Catricia Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garcia #043464 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01548
Petitioner: Frank Nunez Garcia
Respondent: David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John v. Howard
as 4:2021cv00362
Petitioner: Dryl John
Respondent: Catricia Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gaulden v. Howard et al
as 4:2021cv00354
Petitioner: Robert Gaulden
Respondent: Catricia Howard, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?