Arizona Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 9,834
Douglass v. HonorHealth et al
as 2:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Michael W Douglass
Defendant:
HonorHealth, HonorHealth named as: HonorHealth dba Deer Valley Medical Center doing business as Deer Valley Medical Center, Todd LaPorte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Canales v. Trump et al
as 2:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
Jose Ruben Canales, Jr.
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Elon Musk and Michael J Pence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Scott v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Kamala Harris and Joseph R Biden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Carrillo v. Bank of America
as 2:2024cv00885
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
