US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Labor Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 956
Jackson v. Prairie County, Arkansas
as 4:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Cayla Jackson
Defendant:
Prairie County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Duke v. Poplar Grove Operations LLC
as 4:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Antonio Duke
Defendant:
Poplar Grove Operations LLC doing business as Green House Cottages of Poplar Grove
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Does et al v. Helena-West Helena Arkansas, City of
as 2:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
John Does and Jane Does
Defendant:
Helena-West Helena Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Brown v. Penske Truck Leasing Co LP et al
as 4:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Brown
Defendant:
Penske Truck Leasing Company LP, Penske Truck Leasing Corporation and Penske Truck Leasing Co LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Margrave v. Rotech Healthcare Inc
as 4:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Johnson Margrave
Defendant:
Rotech Healthcare Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Macheak v. Baptist Health
as 4:2021cv01217
Plaintiff:
Samuel Macheak
Defendant:
Baptist Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Martin v. Comfort Systems USA Arkansas Inc
as 4:2021cv01215
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Rossi Martin
Defendant:
Comfort Systems USA Arkansas Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Laster et al v. Taylor 4 Delivery Inc et al
as 4:2021cv01209
Plaintiff:
Andre Laster, Aaron Thomas and Tyrus Lamont Boone
Defendant:
Taylor 4 Delivery, Israel Taylor and Taylor 4 Delivery Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Moore v. Transco Lines Inc
as 4:2021cv01156
Plaintiff:
Richard Moore
Defendant:
Transco Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Miller v. BHC Pinnacle Pointe Hospital LLC
as 4:2021cv01137
Plaintiff:
Sidney Miller
Defendant:
BHC Pinnacle Pointe Hospital LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
