US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,746
Maskell v. Ross
as 1:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Circuit Court Judge Quincey Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Fiorentino v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv05026
Plaintiff:
Shane Fiorentino and The Fool
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jesty v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv05025
Plaintiff:
Judge Jesty and Shane Fiorentino
Defendant:
You, The Legislature, The President and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Husbands v. Rowland et al
as 1:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Christopher Husbands
Defendant:
Shelly Rowland, Sabrina Williams, Scott Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jackson v. Walmart Inc.
as 5:2024cv05013
Plaintiff:
Roderick Jackson
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
