US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,165
Hight v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Tina Hight
Defendant:
Deputy Brian Williams, Columbia County Sheriff's Department and Sheriff Mike Loe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Titus v. Gerber Insurance
as 6:2023cv06074
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Gerber Insurance and Gerber Life Insurance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Woods et al
as 5:2023cv05090
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Pittman
Defendant:
Sheriff Lafayette Woods, Chief Joseph Gorman, Lieutenant Joyce Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Greene et al
as 5:2023cv05089
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lynne Jackson and Palacios Magnuson
Defendant:
Katherine Greene, Karas Medical Group, Jail Administrator Randell Denzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2023cv04060
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant:
Connie Mitchell, Public Defender Connor Herrold, Louis White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olson v. Klatt
as 3:2023cv03028
Plaintiff:
Chester Sergio Olson
Defendant:
Sheriff Daniel Klatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pardue v. Perry et al
as 2:2023cv02075
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Pardue
Defendant:
Sheriff Daniel Perry and Steven Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Phaypanya
as 5:2023cv05085
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Parole Officer Yosida Phaypanya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowery v. Nelson et al
as 2:2023cv02074
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Lowery
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Nelson and Officer Hardwick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manes v. Dumas City Jail
as 1:2023cv01044
Plaintiff:
Jason W. Manes
Defendant:
Dumas City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.