Arkansas Labor Cases
Cases 91 - 99 of 99
Jones v. BCC Maumelle Operations LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Bridget Jones
Defendant:
BCC Maumelle Operations LLC and Susan Goff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal-Family & Medical Leave Act
Wade v. Baptist Health et al
as 4:2013cv00048
Plaintiff:
Denise Wade
Defendant:
Baptist Health , Debra Langley and Naomi Wallis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act-1993
Tulley v. Landers Auto Sales LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Keith Tulley
Defendant:
Landers Auto Sales LLC , Rodney Plack and Faye Perry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act-1993
Logan v. Prime Industrial Recruiters Inc et al
as 4:2012cv00794
Plaintiff:
Dedrick Logan
Defendant:
Prime Industrial Recruiters Inc, Welspun Tubular LLC, Welspun Pipes Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 825 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Reding v. Alpena School District
as 3:2012cv03162
Plaintiff:
Jerome P. Reding
Defendant:
Alpena School District
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Bradford v. Rockline Industries Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv05255
Plaintiff:
Johnny Bradford
Defendant:
Rockline Industries Inc. and Ficticious Defendants A,B,C,D,E,F
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Shoemaker v. Sykes Enterprises Incorporated et al
as 4:2012cv00638
Plaintiff:
Terrie Shoemaker
Defendant:
Sykes Enterprises Incorporated and Nikki Edwards
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act-1993
Davis v. Service Professionals Inc et al
as 4:2012cv00606
Plaintiff:
Brenda Davis
Defendant:
Service Professionals Inc and Baptist Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal-Family & Medical Leave Act
Freeman v. Little Rock, City of
as 4:2012cv00574
Plaintiff:
Donald Freeman
Defendant:
Little Rock, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 825
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
