US District Court for the Central District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 37,480
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Daniel Rowe v. A. Bender
as 2:2024cv02282
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rowe
Defendant:
A. Bender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dante Danil Carter v. F. Guzman
as 5:2024cv00567
Petitioner:
Dante Danil Carter
Respondent:
F Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Newman v. The People Of The State Of California
as 2:2024cv02167
Petitioner:
Charles Newman
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roderick Washington v. Richard Brumfield
as 2:2024cv02242
Petitioner:
Roderick Washington
Respondent:
Richard Brumfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Michael S Gorbey v. Larado et al
as 2:2024cv02186
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
Mr. Larado, Mr. Gomez, John Doe A-W Programs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald E. Booker v. M. Welch et al
as 2:2024cv02237
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Booker
Defendant:
Officer M. Welch, Officer Parra and Officer J. Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Theo Lacy Masked Guards
as 8:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Theo Lacy Masked Guards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adolfo Schoneke v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02426
Petitioner:
Adolfo Schoneke
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
