US District Court for the Central District of California
Cases 31 - 40 of 308,070
MAYBERRY v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00951
Plaintiff:
JONELL MARCELLA MAYBERRY
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pena v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv03730
Plaintiff:
Angelica Maria Pena
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Pagano et al
as 2:2024cv03731
Petitioner:
Anthony Pagano and Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Garazi v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03759
Plaintiff:
Rafael Garazi
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Matthew E. Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2024cv03756
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Defendant:
Todd Disner, Trudy Gilmond, Trudy Gilmond, LLC and others
SEQUIOA INSURANCE COMPANY v. March Air Base
as 2:2024cv03754
Plaintiff:
SEQUIOA SEQUIOA INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
March March Air Base
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
