US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Cases 21 - 30 of 122,694
(SS)Fiester v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Robert Fiester
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Knighten v. American Fidelity Assurance Company
as 2:2024cv01301
Plaintiff:
Patsy Knighten
Defendant:
American Fidelity Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Zinman v. CDCR Personnel et al
as 2:2024cv01305
Plaintiff:
Justin Marcus Zinman
Defendant:
CDCR Personnel, P. Llamas, J. Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Geist v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01298
Plaintiff:
Tamara Geist
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Ayodale et al
as 1:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Candace Smith
Defendant:
Mercy Ayodale, Monica Carew and Uyi Igbinoson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Grayson v. California Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv00534
Petitioner:
Erick Dontay Grayson
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Perez v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv01306
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Ford v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Marcel D. Ford
Defendant:
Slyvester Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ellis v. El Dorado County Probation Department
as 2:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Peter Ellis
Defendant:
El Dorado County Probation Department and El Dorado County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rollen v. Hicks
as 2:2024cv01303
Plaintiff:
Van Keyshone Rollen
Defendant:
A. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
