US District Court for the Southern District of California
Cases 11 - 20 of 55,960
Cruz v. Capital One
as 3:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Jose Cruz
Defendant:
Capital One
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rodgers v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00837
Petitioner:
Milton Melvin Rodgers
Respondent:
J. Hill and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez-Perez v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00839
Petitioner:
Carlos Alberto Perez-Perez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Ronald L. Davis, Steven C. Stafford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Blaha v. Cynet Systems INC et al
as 3:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Anton Blaha
Defendant:
Cynet Systems INC, Abbott Laboratories Inc. and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Mendoza v. First Unum Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Siam Mendoza
Defendant:
First Unum Life Insurance Company, American International Group, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
United States of America v. April et al
as 3:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kathleen April, Arthur E. Bailey, James M. Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Coleman v. Angiodynamics, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Serena Coleman
Defendant:
Angiodynamics, Inc., Navilyst Medical, Inc. and PFM Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Wood Ranch Moorpark, Inc. et al v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00818
Defendant:
United Sugar Producers & Refiners Cooperative, ASR Group International, Inc., American Sugar Refining, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Wood Ranch Moorpark, Inc., Wood Ranch Agoura LP, Wood Ranch Camarillo LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Meraz v. Pancho Villa's Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00822
Defendant:
Pancho Villa's Inc. doing business as Pancho Villa Farmer's Market also known as Pancho Villa Mercado, Pancho Villa Mercado and Invisipon, Inc. doing business as Sale-Fish.com
Plaintiff:
Graciela Meraz
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
