Southern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 9,141
Bosselly v. California, State of
as 3:2017cv01915
Petitioner: Matthew R. Bosselly
Respondent: California, State of
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Imperial Beach, City of et al
as 3:2017cv01913
Plaintiff: Robert L. Nelson
Defendant: Imperial Beach, City of, Imperial Beach Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam James Boelkes v. Cynthia Tompkins
as 3:2017cv01905
Petitioner: Adam James Boelkes
Respondent: Cynthia Tompkins
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz v. Oliveira et al
as 3:2017cv01914
Plaintiff: Rogelio May Ruiz
Defendant: R. Oliveira, B. Self, M. Voong and others
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Scarff v. Spearman
as 3:2017cv01903
Petitioner: Justin R. Scarff
Respondent: M. Spearman
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carroll v. California, State of et al
as 3:2017cv01922
Plaintiff: T. Carroll
Defendant: California, State of, Paramo, ., Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
David Thompson Boyd v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 3:2017cv01896
Petitioner: David Thompson Boyd
Respondent: Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez-Sanchez v. USA
as 3:2017cv01901
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Luis Antonio Rodriguez-Sanchez
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rosses v. Centinela State Prison
as 3:2017cv01898
Petitioner: Fabian Lamar Rosses
Respondent: Centinela State Prison
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chamberlin v. Madden et al
as 3:2017cv01874
Petitioner: Matt Chamberlin
Respondent: Raymond Madden , Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?