US District Court for the Southern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 12,068
Gutierrez v. Schick et al
as 3:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Antwann Davon Gutierrez
Defendant:
Kevin Schick, Don Barnes, Jeff Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00492
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Boreago et al
as 3:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Corey Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Boreago, L. Rodriguez, James Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Guzman
as 3:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
Dante Danil Carter
Respondent:
F. Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacey Jr. v. Felts et al
as 3:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Deshone M. Lacey Jr.
Defendant:
M. Felts, Don Barnes, K. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaiser v. GBDF Medical Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv00450
Defendant:
Michael Kaiser, MD Jon Doe, Ruby Gonzalas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguon v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00440
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
James S. Hill and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00449
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fitzhugh v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Fitzhugh
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Hairston v. Lopez et al
as 3:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Defendant:
M. Lopez and G. Ephion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
