U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 4,556
Nichols v. Cleary
as 3:2025cv00529
Plaintiff:
Marvin L. Nichols
Defendant:
Cynthia Cleary
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Wilson v. Damiani
as 3:2025cv00523
Plaintiff:
Clayton Wilson
Defendant:
Stephanie Damiani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boychew v. Guilford PD et al
as 3:2025cv00513
Plaintiff:
Stephen M. Boychew
Defendant:
Guilford PD, Clinton PD and Old Saybrook PD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stowe v. Watertown Police Department et al
as 3:2025cv00507
Plaintiff:
Brandon E. Stowe
Defendant:
Joshua Bernegger, Steven Skowronski, Matthew Chiucarella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Geesaman v. Stamford Superior Court et al
as 3:2025cv00505
Plaintiff:
Cory Geesaman
Defendant:
Stamford Superior Court and State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Office of Child Support Services et al
as 3:2025cv00497
Plaintiff:
Clayton Wilson
Defendant:
Office of Child Support Services, Support Enforcement and Khadijah Hamlette
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
C. v. Danaher
as 3:2025cv00464
Plaintiff:
S. C.
Defendant:
Brendan Danaher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Millien v. Reid et al
as 3:2025cv00365
Plaintiff:
Cedrick Marcus Millien
Defendant:
Mary Elizabeth Reid and Nicholas Bove
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Bugbee v. Sarcia
as 3:2025cv00395
Plaintiff:
William Bugbee
Defendant:
Jill Sarcia and Liberty Bank
Petitioner:
State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Thanh v. Trump et al
as 3:2025cv00375
Plaintiff:
Tran Hien Thanh
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Joe Biden, P. Montez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
