US District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 9,697
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01723
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Leoma v. Brooks et al
as 3:2024cv01725
Defendant:
Lucy Freeman, Kacy Brady, Elasia Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Marie Leoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gilberti v. Harvard University et al
as 3:2024cv01714
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Hunter Carroll, James Dominguez and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Gilberti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Garvey et al
as 3:2024cv01692
Defendant:
Dominic J Wilcox, Margaret M Murphy, Jodi Hill-Lilly and others
Plaintiff:
Laurel Ami Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bey v. Darby et al
as 3:2024cv01705
Plaintiff:
Laurel Ami Bey
Defendant:
Clerk of Court and William Darby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Sanseverino v. Conaway et al
as 3:2024cv01672
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sanseverino and Palace Mini Mart, LLC
Defendant:
Darrius Conaway, John Prisavage and Jakub Majewski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chambers v. Office Superstore East LLC
as 3:2024cv01660
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Chambers
Defendant:
Office Superstore East LLC doing business as Staples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
