US District Court for the District of Connecticut Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 3,017
Abramovich v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01330
Plaintiff:
Matthew Abramovich
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Brian Vigor and Timiki Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alston v. Rutkowski et al
as 3:2023cv01304
Plaintiff:
Ira Alston
Defendant:
Toby Rutkowski, Maurillo R. Amorim, Seth Laprey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Daugherty et al
as 3:2023cv01287
Plaintiff:
Daniel Webb
Defendant:
Daniel Daugherty, Kristine Barone and Burnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Quintana et al
as 3:2023cv01278
Plaintiff:
Wayne Rogers
Defendant:
Samuel Quintana, Perez and Marcus Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. City of Stamford
as 3:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
John Reese
Defendant:
City of Stamford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Town of East Hartford et al
as 3:2023cv01273
Plaintiff:
Steven K. Stanley
Defendant:
Town of East Hartford, John Miller, Rob Vanacore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Dwyer et al
as 3:2023cv01258
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rodriguez
Defendant:
Robert F. Dwyer, Jr., John Ro, Chrostowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Abbott et al
as 3:2023cv01259
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Brian Collier, Texas Board of Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gawlik v. Reis et al
as 3:2023cv01194
Plaintiff:
Jan M. Gawlik
Defendant:
Jennifer Reis, Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Long et al
as 3:2023cv01146
Plaintiff:
Kyle Wood
Defendant:
D. Long and T. Tralli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
