US District Court for the District of Connecticut

Cases filed
Cases 161 - 170 of 43,632
Thompson v. Osborn Correctional
as 3:2024cv00914
Plaintiff: Marteaste Monkinzy Thompson
Defendant: Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00936
Plaintiff: Joseph R. Russell, III
Defendant: Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberge v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00933
Plaintiff: William Bruce Roberge
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00935
Plaintiff: Dion Johnson
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
In Re: Appointment of FPD Attorney
as 3:2024mc00060
Xebastian v. Osborn Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2024cv00951
Plaintiff: Judas Xebastian
Defendant: Osborn Correctional Institution, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sena v. Torres et al
as 3:2024cv00947
Plaintiff: Alexis Sena
Defendant: Torres, Villafane, Aloi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00941
Plaintiff: Jose Vazquez
Defendant: Martin, Moore, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Xebastian v. Osborn Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2024cv00964
Plaintiff: Judas Xebastian
Defendant: Osborn Correctional Institution, Joe Doe, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckweiler v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00928
Plaintiff: Kyle H. Eckweiler
Defendant: Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?