Connecticut Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 3,172
McKnight v. Quiros et al
as 3:2025cv00205
Plaintiff:
Shaka McKnight
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Garibaldi, Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patry v. Quiros et al
as 3:2025cv00143
Plaintiff:
Brandy L. Patry
Defendant:
Angel Quiros and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huertas v. Guadarrama et al
as 3:2025cv00118
Plaintiff:
Branden Huertas
Defendant:
Pedro Guadarrama, Mathews, Burrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irving v. Quiros et al
as 3:2025cv00087
Plaintiff:
Adrian Irving
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, D. Long, Hannah Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2025cv00083
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, UConn Medical, Corr. Managed Health Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Guadarama et al
as 3:2025cv00079
Defendant:
Cuervo, Guadarama and Vereen
Plaintiff:
Patrick Eli Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Roberts et al
as 3:2025cv00066
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Guadarrama, Thompson-Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Kemari Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cerejo et al
as 3:2025cv00075
Defendant:
Meriden Police Department and John Cerejo
Plaintiff:
Tysheim Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Carrion
as 3:2025cv00067
Plaintiff:
Eddie Torres
Defendant:
Carrion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown-Cook v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2025cv00059
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Pearson, Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Tejshor Brown-Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
