US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Social Security Cases

Cases filed
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,845
BLASBERG v. ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00127
Plaintiff: ELLIE SHAINA BLASBERG
Defendant: ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MATHEWS v. KIJAKAZI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00307
Plaintiff: Raymond Mathews
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
BESECKER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00916
Plaintiff: David Allen Besecker
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
STROMGREN v. KIJAKAZI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00908
Plaintiff: MICHELLE ANNE STROMGREN
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
BARNHILL v. SAUL
as 3:2021cv00878
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff: MARCELLA D BARNHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ADAMS v. SAUL
as 5:2021cv00124
Defendant: ANDREW M SAUL
Plaintiff: VIRGINIA CASON ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
WHITEHEAD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00245
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: CATHERINE E WHITEHEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CARLYLE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 4:2021cv00238
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Carlyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
DIXON v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00102
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff: Marlyn Dixon and MARLYN DIXION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MCGUFFIN v. SAUL
as 3:2021cv00808
Plaintiff: JAMES MCGUFFIN
Defendant: ANDREW M SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?