US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,358
GODMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
TAMMY BELINDA GODMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CHAMBERS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 4:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
CARISSA CHAMBERS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
CHASE v. ARBOR PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT INC et al
as 5:2024cv00158
Defendant:
GORDON THAMES, ARBOR PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT INC and JILL HEWITT
Plaintiff:
LINDA C CHASE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
CHASE v ST. JOE COMPANY/SJSA LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
LINDA C CHASE
Defendant:
CARMEN WORLEY, MARY MATOS-WEATHERS and ST JOE COMPANY/SJSA LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
ZIEGENHORN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00345
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ANNE-FRANCES ZIEGENHORN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RAULERSON v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2024cv00119
Defendant:
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION, FLORIDA PARKS AND RECREATION and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RAULERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
INGRAM v. GROUP LISENBY, LLC
as 5:2024cv00153
Defendant:
GROUP LISENBY, LLC
Plaintiff:
MARCUS INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
