US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,158
GODMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
TAMMY BELINDA GODMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAMBERS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 4:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
CARISSA CHAMBERS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
RAULERSON v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2024cv00119
Defendant:
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION, FLORIDA PARKS AND RECREATION and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RAULERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ZIEGENHORN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00345
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ANNE-FRANCES ZIEGENHORN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLEMING v. STRONG et al
as 4:2024cv00282
Defendant:
NURSE HAMILTON, CASE MANAGER MCMILLAN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
RHONDA FLEMING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
JACKSON v. JACKSONVILLE SHERIFFS OFFICE
as 4:2024cv00270
Defendant:
JACKSONVILLE SHERIFFS OFFICE
Plaintiff:
TREY O'NEAL JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OLIVER v. JOHNSON
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
JOHN H OLIVER, II
Defendant:
TANYANEKIA JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAMBLISS v. BAGGETT
as 5:2024cv00140
Defendant:
HAYES BAGGETT
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY THOMAS CHAMBLISS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DVOINIK v. DWORKIN et al
as 4:2024cv00266
Defendant:
JESSICA RICHMAN DWORKIN and RICHARD D MCCULLOUGH
Plaintiff:
ELENA DVOINIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARCE v. OKALOOSA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
ARMANDO ARCE
Defendant:
OKALOOSA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Jacob Martincin, James Koehn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
