US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 7,020
JONES v. BURGESS et al
as 3:2024cv00582
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL and ALLISON BURGESS
Plaintiff:
TONY JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCNEW v. BARRS et al
as 1:2024cv00208
Defendant:
SPRING, JOHN DOE, BENGYEL and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MCNEW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. PUGH et al
as 3:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
TREVON DEJAH BROWN
Defendant:
JOHNSON, JONES, CARRIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAYFORD v. CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00573
Defendant:
A JOHNS, E PEREZ-HERNANDEZ, T BOWDEN and others
Plaintiff:
DARREL LEON RAYFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00456
Defendant:
FLORIDA BAR, STATE OF FLORIDA and PRINCIPALS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA AND THE FLORIDA BAR
Plaintiff:
LEE R SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. HUGHES et al
as 3:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WARREN FORD
Defendant:
CHARLES RICHTER, CHRISTY WHEATON and CHRISTOPHER HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLEMONS v. MARTIN et al
as 4:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L CLEMONS
Defendant:
MARTIN, DAVIS and TRAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITTED v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WHITTED
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and OKALOOSA COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLENN v. FLAGG
as 4:2024cv00443
Defendant:
FLAGG
Plaintiff:
STONEY GLENN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HANSON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00440
Defendant:
CLAYTON WEISS, RICKY DIXON and B MCCOLLOUGH
Plaintiff:
JONATHON HANSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
