US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 6,828
JOHNSON v. YOUNG
as 5:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
JAMES RUSSELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. PACE
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
JAMES RUSSELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
ANDY PACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. MITCHELL et al
as 5:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
RODNEY J WHITE
Defendant:
MITCHELL and JOSEPH STREET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHISOLM v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
DEONDRE MIJAHN CHISOLM
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and N PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTGOMERY v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
JOHN W MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. DOE
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JAMELL M COOPER
Defendant:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. GRACEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 5:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
WILLIS ARMANDO MILLER
Defendant:
GRACEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LORUSSO v. DIXON et al
as 3:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LORUSSO
Respondent:
FLORIDA SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, ASHLEY MOODY and CENTURION MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TANNER v. FRENCH et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, DIRECTOR CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. DYKES et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JAMES DIXON, JR
Defendant:
TRAVIS EARL DYKES, JONATHAN L CARTER, TYLER MARIE MCCRANIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
