US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,580
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WASHINGTON v. HANCOCK COUNTY GEORGIA
as 5:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
RASHONTE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMAS v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
SHANEKA THOMAS
Defendant:
CHARLIE LARANZO ROBERTS, MICHAEL J. PERSLEY, ALBANY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
BRIDGES v. EARLY COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 1:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRIDGES
Defendant:
EARLY COUNTY GEORGIA, JAMES KIMBLE and WILLIAM C PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS et al v. BLECKLEY COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
PAUL WILLIAMS, HEATHER WILLIAMS and HIDDEN CREEK FARMS & TRANSPORT LLC
Defendant:
BLECKLEY COUNTY GEORGIA, MIKE DAVIS and JAYME KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
