US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,357
WEBB v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2022cv00255
Plaintiff: DAVID Q WEBB
Defendant: STATE OF GEORGIA, TRACY JANE MULLIS, BRADFORD LEE RIGBY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00075
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ANDERSON v. MOULTRIE POLICE DEPT. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00068
Plaintiff: NICKLOUS TRAVIS ANDERSON
Defendant: MOULTRIE POLICE DEPT and Officer WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00067
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
CLARK v. TROUTMAN et al
as 5:2022cv00253
Plaintiff: SHAUNDA CLARK
Defendant: GRACIE S TROUTMAN, KELDRICK JAMAR BROWN, TAKEITA A CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00106
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HALL et al v. FRANKLINS SPRING CREEK FORD
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff: CAREY HALL and JIMMY HALL JR
Defendant: FRANKLINS SPRING CREEK FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00073
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
DUE v. HOFFMAN et al
as 1:2022cv00102
Plaintiff: RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant: MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and ROBERT T DAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DUE v. DAWSON et al
as 1:2022cv00103
Plaintiff: RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant: ROBERT T DAWSON, MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and BRIAN D BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?