US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,668
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
EUBANKS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP et al
as 3:2024cv00005
Plaintiff: BECKY L EUBANKS
Defendant: WAL-MART STORES EAST LP and WALMART INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
PORTER et al v. CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT OF COLUMBUS GEORGIA et al
as 4:2024cv00014
Plaintiff: Clarence Nash and Tonyaneka Porter
Defendant: CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT OF COLUMBUS GEORGIA, Luis Morales, Jr. and LUIS MORALES, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CRANE v. CLARK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00018
Plaintiff: AMY CRANE
Defendant: SARAH CLARK, BRANDI CUNNINGHAM and ASHLEY SLAUGHTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00022
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00021
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7702 Actions Involving Discrimination
v. DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION
as 5:2024cv00017
Defendant: DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
v. OLIVER
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff: ANTHONY J OLIVER
Defendant: COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?