US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,798
RADI v. EIDSON et al
as 1:2024cv00140
Defendant: HOWARD MCCLAIN, PATRICK EIDSON and MATTHEW S RADI
Plaintiff: AMANDA ALICE RADI
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
CLAYTON v. CONE et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Defendant: SHERIFF LEE CONE, GENESYS HEALTH ALLIANCE LLC, DIANE SANDERS and others
Plaintiff: JACK CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00316
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
v. MILEY et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Defendant: DEBORAH GONZALEZ and RICHARD MILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MILEY v. GONZALEZ We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff: RICHARD MILEY
Defendant: DEBORAH GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00311
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MCCOMAS v. UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS CLARKE COUNTY
as 3:2024cv00089
Defendant: OFFICER CALEB CAMERON, MAYOR KELLY GIRTZ, OFFICER STANLEY DENISE and others
Plaintiff: CAREY LENEIL MCCOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00310
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SANDERS v. DAVIS
as 5:2024cv00307
Plaintiff: OMAR SANDERS
Defendant: SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
DANIELY v. DENNY
as 5:2024cv00306
Defendant: Deputy NICHOLAS DENNY and SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS
Plaintiff: KENDRELL DAIMON DANIELY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?