US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 3,658
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GRAY v. SASNETT et al
as 7:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GRAY
Defendant:
CATHY SASNETT, SGT. KYLE WHITE and MIKE WELCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SMITHCO RECYCLING LLC et al v DECATUR COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 1:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
SMITHCO RECYCLING LLC, SMITHCO TRANSFER, LLC, Stacey Smith and others
Defendant:
DECATUR COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, WILEY GRIFFIN, III, WENDELL COFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GREEN v. SURINE et al
as 3:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
WILLIE AARON GREEN
Defendant:
JONATHAN SURINE, CARL MITCHAM, THE UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DICKERSON v. BURDEN et al
as 4:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RAY DICKERSON
Defendant:
ANTAEVYON BURDEN and LAMAR COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HANSLEY v. C&F FINANCE COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
DEMORRIO HANSLEY
Defendant:
C&F FINANCE COMPANY and FLOWERS HONDA DEALERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
