US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 2,584
WILLIAMS v. TATUM et al
as 5:2023cv00018
Petitioner:
CARA WILLIAMS
Respondent:
Warden MURRAY TATUM and MEOSHA MCMIHHIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AMERICA v. REAVES
as 5:2023cv00013
Petitioner:
JAMES AMERICA
Respondent:
ANGELA REAVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHANDLER v. STRAUDER et al
as 3:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
JAKALE E CHANDLER
Defendant:
OFFICER STRAUDER, OFFICER WOODS, OFFICER POWEL and others
Respondent:
SHERIFF JOHN Q WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
POSTELL v. SMITH
as 5:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
DARIAN POSTELL
Respondent:
WARDEN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LANDERS v. COUNTRYMAN
as 4:2022cv00201
Petitioner:
QUINTAVIOUS M LANDERS, SR
Respondent:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HUNTER v. BEASLEY
as 7:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
JORDAN HUNTER
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PATTERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2022cv00435
Petitioner:
JAMES C PATTERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. HOLBROOK et al
as 3:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER HILL
Respondent:
MELISSA B HOLBROOK, MICHAEL COVENEY, JUDGE LAUREN WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. DEESE
as 5:2022cv00433
Petitioner:
SAMMY LEE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
SHERIFF TERRY DEESE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ESTES-ROBINSON v. WIZA
as 5:2022cv00429
Petitioner:
YAHAAKOB ESTES-ROBINSON
Respondent:
WARDEN SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
