US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 2,579
DUNN v. TOBY
as 5:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
DARIUS JARRELL DUNN
Respondent:
WARDEN ANNETTE TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. COUNTRYMAN
as 4:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
ROBERT L JACKSON
Respondent:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HODNETT v. SMITH
as 4:2023cv00082
Petitioner:
JOHNNY J HODNETT
Respondent:
WARDEN TAMARSHE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRICE v. PINEIRO
as 1:2023cv00078
Petitioner:
CEDRIC PRICE
Respondent:
AARON PINEIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LYONS v. EMMONS
as 5:2023cv00165
Petitioner:
SCOTT LYONS
Respondent:
WARDEN SEAN EMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. BEASLEY
as 7:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
ROY MANDELL SMITH
Defendant:
Lt AARON KIRK, Supervisor KEVIN CONNOLLY, NED M MIKULA and others
Respondent:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRADFORD v. SMITH
as 3:2023cv00052
Petitioner:
AVERY BRADFORD
Respondent:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURNETT v. MOORE
as 3:2023cv00050
Petitioner:
KODY K BURNETT
Respondent:
SHERIFF MICHAEL J MOORE and Warden ANNETTIA TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RIVERA-RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES
as 4:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
ERNESTO RIVERA-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
HORRY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2023cv00128
Petitioner:
DARREL HORRY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF GEORGIA and WARDEN WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.