US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 10,394
BILOUS v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
JUSTAN BILOUS
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, PHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, PA JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOGGERTY v. USA
as 7:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
JUANJAVA BOGGERTY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HALL v. USA
as 5:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
TAMARA HALL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walker v. USA
as 1:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
ELBERT WALKER, JR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JEFFERSON v. STATE
as 5:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
ORLANDO LAMAR JEFFERSON
Respondent:
STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JORDAN v. MACON STATE PRISON
as 5:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
MARCUS JORDAN
Defendant:
MACON STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AVERY v. SIZEMORE et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
CRAIG DEWAYNE AVERY
Defendant:
JUDGE SIZEMORE, LEWIS LAMB, LEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
